Everything about Irregular Verbs totally explained
In contrast to
regular verbs,
irregular verbs are those
verbs that fall outside the standard patterns of
conjugation in the
languages in which they occur.
What counts as an irregular verb is strongly dependent on the language itself. In
English, the surviving
strong verbs are considered irregular. In
Old English, by contrast, the strong verbs are usually not considered irregular, at least not only by virtue of being strong verbs: there were several recognized classes of strong verbs, which were regular within themselves.
In
Latin, similarly, most verbs outside the first or fourth
conjugations have three
principal parts, which form part of the
lexicon and must be learned. The three principal parts are the
present tense stem, the
perfect tense stem, and the
past participle; a variety of inflections,
ablaut, and sometimes
reduplication are used to form these parts. For example, the principal parts of
spondeō ("I promise") include
spondēre ("to promise"),
spopondī ("I promised"), showing reduplication, and
sponsus ("promised"); these forms can't be predicted from the present stem, but when you know all four, the entire system can be constructed from these three parts by rule. This verb isn't usually considered irregular in Latin. Latin also exhibits
deponent verbs, inflected in the
passive voice alone; and
defective verbs, missing some principal parts. Truly irregular verbs in Latin are a rather small class; they include
esse ("to be");
dare and its derivatives ("to give");
êsse ("to eat");
ferre and its derivatives ("to carry");
velle and its derivatives ("to wish");
ire and its derivatives ("to go"); and
fieri ("to become"). Most irregular Latin verbs are themselves vestiges of the
athematic conjugations of
Indo-European, a surviving (and regular) group found in
Greek.
Greek and
Sanskrit show even greater complexities, with widely different
thematic and athematic inflection sets; which set goes with which verb stem can't be predicted by rule. In languages of this type, these variations are not usually enough to label a verb "irregular". They instead form a part of the
lexicon; when a verb is learned, the various patterns used to conjugate it must also be learned.
By contrast, in
modern English, the strong verbs are largely a closed and vestigial class. (
Analogy has created a few new strong verbs, such as
dive.) All of the surviving strong verbs differ markedly from other verbs, and thus are classified as "irregular"; here, they're conspicuous exceptions in the midst of a much larger class of rule-bound regular verbs.
In some languages, the count of irregular verbs could be greatly expanded if one were to count verbs that are irregular only in their spelling, but not in their pronunciation. For example, in
Spanish, the verb
rezar ("to pray") is conjugated in the present subjunctive as
rece,
reces,
rece, etc. The substitution of
c for
z doesn't affect the pronunciation. It is strictly a matter of
orthography. Therefore, this verb isn't normally considered irregular.
Other issues affecting the count of irregular verbs in various languages are:
- How many patterns of conjugation are considered standard. If a large enough group of irregular verbs in a language have parallel conjugations, it's arbitrary whether to count that as an additional "standard" conjugation or as a large collection of irregular verbs.
- Which verbs are to be counted as separate, rather than merely prefixed. For example, in English, to withhold conjugates exactly like to hold, and in Spanish, detener ("to detain") conjugates exactly like tener ("to have"). In each case, are these to be counted as two separate irregular verbs, or as a single irregular verb, with and without a prefix?
Number of irregular verbs in different languages
While the term "irregular verb" isn't precisely enough defined to allow a definitive count of the irregular verbs in all languages, the following table is illustrative of how much this phenomenon varies across languages.
| Language |
Count |
Notes |
| Latin |
924 |
|
| Modern Greek |
over 500 |
|
| Italian |
over 400 |
|
| Ancient Greek |
226 |
|
| German |
181 |
The verb sein “to be” is the only completely irregular verb in German. |
| English |
178 |
see English irregular verbs, List of English irregular verbs and |
| Danish |
131 |
|
| French |
81 |
|
| Swedish |
76 |
|
| Dutch |
55 |
|
| Spanish |
46 |
see Spanish irregular verbs |
| Catalan |
40 |
| Scottish Gaelic |
11 |
|
| Welsh |
11 |
|
| Finnish |
≤4 + 4 |
Only the verb olla "to be" has one truly irregular ending (added with some consonant assimilation), and a few verbs have rare consonant elision patterns warranting memorizing them. For example, juoks+en "I run" elides 'k' to give juos+ta "to run", and näh+dä "to see" elides 'h' to give nä+en "I see". Spoken Finnish has further irregularity on the verb "to be" (oo- pro ole-, also occasionally o pro on), and four additional irregular verbs (tuu "come", mee "go", paa "put", nää "see"). |
| Japanese |
≤5 |
する suru "to do", 来る kuru "to come", 行く iku "to go", ある aru "to exist (inanimate)", and くれる kureru "to give (to the in-group)" are irregular. There are also several categories of verbs with either a very small number of members (the five honorific verbs), or conjugations based on multiple stems (aisuru and aisu "to love" are used interchangeably but the former isn't used in certain forms such as the imperative *aishiro); these are considered by some authorities irregular and by others not. |
| Ukrainian |
≤3 |
Бути (to be), їсти (to eat), давати (to give) are the only irregular "basic" verbs. Also, бути is irregular in that sense that it withstands inflection except for when forming infinitive (бути (inf.) — є (non inf.)). Though the actual number of irregular verbs may be considered to be much higher since language's synthetic nature allows to make complex verbs based on these. |
| Latvian |
3 |
these 3 verbs are būt, iet, dot |
| Chinese |
1 |
有 yǒu forms its negative with 没 méi rather than with 不 bù in Mandarin and has a separate negative form 冇 mou in Cantonese |
| Northern Sami |
1 |
Only the verb leat "to be" is irregular; all others are conjugated regularly. |
| Quechua |
1 |
Only the verb kay "to be" is irregular. |
| Turkish |
0 |
- |
| Interlingua |
0 |
While Interlingua has no true irregular verbs, it has three short verb forms: es ("is", "am", "are"), ha ("have", "has"), and va ("go", "goes"). These forms are optional but widely used. Interlingua also has a few alternate forms of esser ("to be"), such as sera for essera ("will be"). These alternate forms differ from an irregular verb in that they're not a full conjugation. They are optional and rare. |
| Esperanto |
0 |
(like most constructed languages) |
Further Information
Get more info on 'Irregular Verbs'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://irregular_verb.totallyexplained.com">Irregular verb Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |